The “28 Years Later” Reviews Are In
More than two decades after introducing the concept of ‘fast zombies’ in “28 Days Later,” Danny Boyle delivers the first of a new trilogy with “28 Years Later” and the results are very good it seems. With 85 reviews counted, the film sits at a 95% on Rotten Tomatoes, ahead of the 87% of the […] The post The “28 Years Later” Reviews Are In appeared first on Dark Horizons.

More than two decades after introducing the concept of ‘fast zombies’ in “28 Days Later,” Danny Boyle delivers the first of a new trilogy with “28 Years Later” and the results are very good it seems.
With 85 reviews counted, the film sits at a 95% on Rotten Tomatoes, ahead of the 87% of the original film and 72% of its sequel “28 Weeks Later”.
On Metacritic it sits at 78/100 from 31 reviews – putting it ahead of the original film at 73/100 and #5 on Boyle’s overall filmography (“Slumdog Millionaire” is #1 at 84/100).
Compared to other zombie works – its coming in behind the 84/100 and 81/100 the two seasons of HBO’s “The Last of Us” scored on Metacritic, and in between the 96% and 92% scores for the same on Rotten Tomatoes.
But it is going fairly in line with the film “Train to Busan” which also sits at 95% on RT and at slightly lower 73/100 on MC. Here’s a sampling of reviews:
“It never feels like a cynical attempt to revisit proven material merely for commercial reasons. Instead, the filmmakers appear to have returned to a story whose allegorical commentary on today’s grim political landscape seems more relevant than ever.” – David Rooney, THR
“Boyle and Garland’s return to the franchise seems deliberately set on reinventing as many cliches as it can, while also exploding our assumptions about what a zombie movie might be.” – Liz Shannon Miller, Consequence
“Typically, we look to adrenaline-fueled entertainment for catharsis. Boyle’s thrilling reboot offers enlightenment as well.” – Peter DeBruge, Variety
“Wildly unexpected for a film that’s been promised for so long, this tense and tender post-apocalyptic drama contends that to exist in denial of death is to corrupt the integrity of life itself.” – David Ehrlich, Indiewire
“The filmmakers haven’t redefined the zombie genre, but they’ve refocused their own culturally significant riff into a lush, fascinating epic that has way more to say about being human than it does about (re-)killing the dead.” – William Bibbiani, The Wrap
“28 Years Later is a post-Brexit, Covid-conscious take on this world, with ideas about nationalism, isolationism, and weaponised culture added to the mix. But it’s punchy and simple once again.” – Clarisse Loughrey, Independent
“This riveting blend of horror and heart reminds that death, horror’s favorite equalizer, can be as beautiful as it can be cruel.” – Megan Navarro, Bloody Disgusting
“28 Years Later is choppy, muddled, strange, and not always convincing. But I’m not sure I’ll ever forget it.” – Bilge Ebiri, Vulture
“28 Years Later tries hard to outpace the original film and keep up with the culture at large, but instead it lumbers slowly behind.” – Rafer Guzman, Newsday
The film is reportedly projected to have a $28-30 million domestic and $56 million global opening weekend this coming weekend.
The post The “28 Years Later” Reviews Are In appeared first on Dark Horizons.